Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Connie, You are not in Kansas Anymore


From ThinkProgress . . . link below


KS GOP Rep. Connie O’Brien Says She Can Tell Who Is ‘Illegal’ Because They Have ‘The Olive Complexion’


One week ago, the Kansas House Federal and State Committee held a hearing about in-state tuition being granted to the children of undocumented immigrants, which has been the policy in the state since 2004.

Speaking in favor of repealing the law, Rep. Connie O’Brien (R-KS) began telling an anecdote at the hearing about how her son had difficulty in getting financial assistance to attend college. She explained that she took her son to a financial aid office, and as she was waiting in line, she believed there was a girl waiting in line with them who was “not originally from this country.” Fellow committee member Rep. Sean Gatewood (D-KS) asked O’Brien how she knew this student was “illegal.” O’Brien replied that she knew because the student “wasn’t black, she wasn’t Asian, and she had the olive complexion”:

[. . .] 

Kansas Democratic Party lawmakers have asked her to apologize. For her part, O’Brien counters that she’s been told she’s “got olive complexion” and that she’s not going to apologize until she’s “had time to think.”


Here is a link to the ThinkProgress item, where you can here Representative O'Brien's comment.

ThinkProgress » KS GOP Rep. Connie O’Brien Says She Can Tell Who Is ‘Illegal’ Because They Have ‘The Olive Complexion’

Thursday, February 10, 2011

FOX NEWS INSIDER: Stuff Is Just Made Up



“They’re a propaganda outfit but they call themselves news.” This, from a Fox News Insider.



. . . as reported by MediaMatters. Here are parts of the MM piece (with a link below, to the entire MM blog article) 


FOX NEWS INSIDER: “Stuff Is Just Made Up”


February 10, 2011 7:20 am ET by Eric Boehlert

[. . .] 

“I don’t think people would believe it’s as concocted as it is; that stuff is just made up.”
[. . .]
a former Fox News employee who recently agreed to talk with Media Matters confirmed what critics have been saying for years about Murdoch’s cable channel. Namely, that Fox News is run as a purely partisan operation, virtually every news story is actively spun by the staff, its primary goal is to prop up Republicans and knock down Democrats, and that staffers at Fox News routinely operate without theslightest regard for fairness or fact checking.   
“It is their M.O. to undermine the administration and to undermine Democrats,” says the source. “They’re a propaganda outfit but they call themselves news.”
[. . .]
“They say one thing and do another. They insist on maintaining this charade, this façade, that they’re balanced or that they’re not right-wing extreme propagandist,” says the source. But it’s all a well-orchestrated lie, according this former insider. It’s a lie that permeates the entire Fox News culture and one that staffers and producers have to learn quickly in order to survive professionally.
“You have to work there for a while to understand the nods and the winks,” says the source. “And God help you if you don’t because sooner or later you’re going to get burned.”
The source explains:
“Like any news channel there’s lot of room for non-news content. The content that wasn’t ‘news,’ they didn’t care what we did with as long as it was amusing or quirky or entertaining;  as along as it brought in eyeballs.  But anything—anything--that was a news story you had to understand what the spin should be on it. If it was a big enough story it was explained to you in the morning [editorial] meeting. If it wasn’t explained, it was up to you to know the conservative take on it. There’s a conservative take on every story no matter what it is. So you either get told what it is or you better intuitively know what it is.”
[. . .] 
“When I first got there back in the day, and I don’t know how they indoctrinate people now, but back in the day when they were “training” you, as it were, they would say, ‘Here’s how we’re different.’ They’d say if there is an execution of a condemned man at midnight and there are all the live truck outside the prison and all the lives shots.  CNN would go, ‘Yes, tonight John Jackson, 25 of Mississippi, is going to die by lethal injection for the murder of two girls.’ MSNBC  would say the same thing. 
“We would come out and say, ‘Tonight, John Jackson who kidnapped an innocent two year old, raped her, sawed her head off and threw it in the school yard, is going to get the punishment that a jury of his peers thought he should get.’ And they say that’s the way we do it here. And you’re going , alright, it’s a bit of an extreme example but it’s something to think about. It’s not unreasonable.
"When you first get in they tell you we’re a bit of a counterpart to the screaming left wing lib media. So automatically you have to buy into the idea that the other media is howling left-wing. Don’t even start arguing that or you won’t even last your first day. 
For the first few years it was let’s take the conservative take on things. And then after a few years it evolved into, well it’s not just the conservative take on things, we’re going to take the Republican take on things which is not necessarily in lock step with the conservative point of view.
“And then two, three, five years into that it was, we’re taking the Bush line on things, which was different than the GOP. We were a Stalin-esque mouthpiece.  It was just what Bush says goes on our channel. And by that point it was just totally dangerous.  Hopefully most people understand how dangerous it is for a media outfit to be a straight, unfiltered mouthpiece for an unchecked president.”
[. . .]
“It was a kick ass mentality too,” says the former Fox News insider. “It was relentless and it never went away. If one controversy faded, goddamn it they would find another one. They were in search of these points of friction real or imagined. And most of them were imagined or fabricated. You always have to seem to be under siege. You always have to seem like your values are under attack. The brain trust just knew instinctively which stories to do, like the War on Christmas.”
[. . .]
“People assume you need a license to call yourself a news channel. You don’t. So because they call themselves Fox News, people probably give them a pass on a lot of things,” says the source.
[. . .]
“I don’t think people understand that it’s an organization that’s built and functions by intimidation and bullying, and its goal is to prop up and support Republicans and the GOP and to knock down Democrats. People tend think that stuff that’s on TV is real, especially under the guise of news. You’d think that people would wise up, but they don’t.”
[. . .] 
If you take on Fox, they’ll kick you in the ass,” says the source. “I’m sure most [journalists]  know that. It’s not worth being  Swift Boated for your effort,” a reference to  how Fox News traditionally attacks journalists who write, or are perceived to have written, anything negative things about the channel.
The former insider admits to being perplexed in late 2009 when the Obama White House called out Murdoch’s operation as not being a legitimate new source, only to have major Beltway media players rush to the aid of Fox News and admonish the White House for daring to criticize the cable channel.
“That blew me away,” says the source, who stresses the White House’s critique of Fox News “happens to be true.” 

FOX NEWS INSIDER: “Stuff Is Just Made Up”

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

BORN IN THE USA? So What? Birthright Citizenship Under Threat

The Tea Partiers praise the US Constitution - but not all of it.


The Constitution extends citizenship to all born in the US.


But a right-wing movement is in place to deprive citizenship from infants born in the US - if their parents - or it just their mothers? - are not citizens.


Would it be rude to suggest that a push for the constitutional amendment is a Whites-only-please gambit? Let's be fair and wait to see which politicians and pressure groups support this effort.


For recent details - and with more to follow - here is a helpful NY Times link:


Birthright Citizenship Looms as Next Immigration Battle - NYTimes.com

Saturday, January 1, 2011

" . . . the deteriorated moral state of the senior commanders . . ."





 - Breaking the Silence  - http://www.shovrimshtika.org/index_e.asp


Quoted in 

Israeli Ex-Soldier Defends Her Facebook Snapshots

This interview appeared in The Lede,  NYT Blog Aug 17 2010
______________________________


Rank: First Sergeant
Place of incident: Nablus
Description:



End of 2003

Let’s start with the things you want to tell, the things lying heavy on your heart. I ask you to tell everything, what happened, how you felt, what do you think now…

What disturbs me most, and what bothers me most is the lack of value of human life in the OT (occupied territories).Of course not that of Israelis. When my friend was killed, I caught myself suddenly saying ‘Wallah’ (exclamation of surprise) here’s a man gone, in the middle of his life. A person who’s life has stopped. All the aspects of a human being: his aspirations, what he was, what he said, the happy moments of his life, his friends. A man’s life has lots of aspects, and all of a sudden, everything stopped. And then it dawned on me that this was the death of a human being and that you start thinking ‘Wallah’ what about all these people we killed ? And my team killed….innocent people, or at least apparently innocent people. Some were killed by mistake, really by mistake. But what’s a mistake? Really—say ‘we are sorry’. We killed your husband, your daughter, your child or your grandfather or whoever else. And there were those executed on orders that, in my opinion, were illegal. As I told you, the most disturbing thing to me is that there is an absolutely Wild West in the OT. Brigade Commanders, Regiment Commanders and Company Commanders do whatever comes to their mind. No one checks them, and no one stops them. We got in- for many nights in the (Nablus) casbah - and our firing orders were: between 2 to 4(AM) anybody spotted in the casbah, is doomed to die. These were the words: ‘doomed to die’.

Who spoke these words ?

Words we heard from the CC (Company Commander) in the briefing. The CC gave us a briefing before every mission. Sometimes he said between 2 and 4 whoever wanders around the casbah is doomed to die, or sometimes between 1 and 3: doomed to die.


Our team entered (the casbah) and took over a building. From this building we advanced in a worm-like fashion, you know, blowing up a wall, going from house to house, blowing up another wall and entering another building. Like a worm, in the casbah and at Balata (refugee camp), that are highly crowded areas, avoiding crossing the alleys that were a ‘killing zone’. Whenever you crossed one of these alleys your chances of coming out alive were not good. Therefore we developed a tactic of avoiding the alleys altogether and passing through walls of buildings. As buildings are very close to each other, and have mutual walls. So you take a dynamite brick, attach it to a wall, explode it, and climb through the hole in the wall. This is a very slow advance. When you reach a strategic building, commanding its surroundings, you set up a post there to observe the surrounding alleys and roof tops.

What do you do with the family in the ‘strategic’ building?

I know all the stories, and heard from here to eternity about the non-human treatment of these families, and all sorts of plunder. I want to state here for the protocol that in my unit there wasn’t anything like it. We were always… we blew a hole in a wall, we entered homes, we gathered the entire family, not by shouting, but quietly. We tried to calm them down. Placed them in a room, we locked them up and placed a guard. Every time they had to use the toilet, they asked us, and they did with someone accompanying them. We moved furniture aside, sat on the floor, took up positions, built MG and sharpshooter positions in the highest windows or rooftops.


This means that destruction of a house entered by our forces only meant destruction of only a wall?

Yes, in the operation ‘Defensive Shield’, only destruction of a wall. After that things changed. During ‘Defensive Shield’ we cleaned up houses. The houses we left were cleaned. We made sure to clean it. That was the way with my team.


[….]


I don’t remember how long it took to conquer the entire casbah, maybe a week, maybe two. It happened during the battle of the casbah. We entered, continued advancing in the ‘worm fashion’, took over a strategic building, set up positions there, and one of the sharpshooters identified a man on the roof. The man was on a roof about two roofs away from us. I think he was between 50 to 70 m from the sharpshooter. Unarmed, I looked at the man with a night vision binocular. He was unarmed. It was 2AM: an unarmed man on a rooftop, turning around. We reported it to the PC (Platoon Commander) who ordered ‘Take him down’. He (the sharpshooter) shot and took him down. The PC, in a radioed message, actually sealed the man’s fate to die. An unarmed man!

 Did you see that he was unarmed?

I saw with my own eyes that the man was unarmed. He (the sharpshooter) also reported… the report said: ‘an unarmed man on the roof’. The PC interpreted it that the man was an observer. He interpreted that the man was an observer, meaning the man was not directly threatening us, and he ordered us to shoot the man and we did it…I myself didn’t shoot, a fellow soldier shot and killed him. And you start thinking that in the US death sentences are imposed, and on every sentence there are thousands of appeals, as they take it very seriously, judges, academically trained people, and there are demonstrations, and so on. Actually a 26-year-old man, my PC, imposed a death sentence on an unarmed man. Who was he? What’s that ‘an observer?’ So what? Is that enough of a reason to kill him? And how did he know he was an observer? He obviously didn’t know. All he knew was that there was an unarmed man on top of the roof, and he ordered to kill him, which, in my opinion was an illegitimate order, and we carried the order out, and killed a human being. The man died. In my opinion that was outright murder. And that wasn’t the only case.

http://www.shovrimshtika.org/testimonies_e.asp?cat=19




Wednesday, September 22, 2010

MARTIN PERETZ - SHOUTS FROM THE BLEACHERS

Martin Peretz of the New Republic wrote an article, from which I have taken three sentences that appeared back-to-back. This patter is making news just now because Mr. Peretz is up for a Harvard honor, which he will receive but at which event he is no longer invited to make a speech. (Lacking Solomonic wisdom, Harvard is going to slice the baby in two.)


Peretz' entire opinion piece can be read at: http://www.tnr.com/blog/77475/the-new-york-times-laments-sadly-wary-misunderstanding-muslim-americans-really-it-sadly-w


The three sentences of Mr. Peretz, which I address are:


(1) "But, frankly, Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims." 


(2) "And among those Muslims led by the Imam Rauf there is hardly one who has raised a fuss about the routine and random bloodshed that defines their brotherhood." 


(3) "So, yes, I wonder whether I need honor these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the First Amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse."


Mr. Peretz has apologized for sentence Number 3. For this statement of apology, see http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-spine/77607/martin-peretz-apology


As to his assertion that "Muslim life is cheap" Mr Peretz sees this as a statement of "fact."


As to his criticism that "Muslims led by the Imam Rauf" have "hardly raised a fuss" about the killings of Muslims by Muslims which "defines their brotherhood" neither Mr Peretz nor any of his critics (whom I have read) are exercised by this comment.


All of this patter (including my own statements) reflect shouts from the bleachers, which actual players are entitled to ignore. 


Death by murder is horrendous, whether on a small or large scale, whether motivated by private grievances, religious zealotry, warfare, or mental illness. It seems very much beside the point to fault bystanders for not shouting loudly enough, after the fact. 

Friday, September 17, 2010

TEA PARTY ASPIRANT, NOW NOMINEE, CHANGES POSITIONS ON MASTURBATION, ABORTION, MILITARY READINESS


Christine O'Donnell said in the 90's that she knew many virgins who were not "sexually pure" because they had looked at pornography. "The Bible says that lust in your heart is committing adultery. You can't masturbate without lust." 
She has also said that abortion is wrong and ought to be against the law. Period.
She has also stated that women ought not to be permitted to serve in the military, as this would undermine US military readiness.
Presumably, these views helped her secure the GOP nomination for the US Senate. But these are no longer her views.
On Sept 16, 2010, at a candidate's forum, she retreated from all of this.
On masturbation, the unmarried nominee now says,"It's personal." She explained her earlier condemnation of masturbation, this way: "I was in my twenties and very excited and passionate about my newfound faith. But I can assure you, my faith has matured."
On abortion, O'Donnell now says, she would support a woman's right to get an abortion if her life was at risk. 
She added, "Uncle Sam has no business in the examination room coming between you and your doctor."
On whether women ought to be permitted to have careers in the military, she now says, "Yeah, of course."
Nothing like getting nominated to turn a right wing nut into an inconsistent right wing nut. 

Saturday, August 14, 2010

GLENN BECK - MESSIANIC IDIOCY

From Media Matters (Aug 14 2010): 

Glenn Beck, Holy Warrior

In April 2-10:

Glenn Beck informed his radio listeners that during his trip to the Vatican, an "individual" there told him that "what you're doing is wildly important" in the upcoming struggle against forces of "great darkness."

A few days earlier Beck explained that he was promoting "the plan that [God] would have me articulate, I think, to you," against "darkness." 

These remarks are consistent with Beck's regular portrayal of himself as fighting on behalf of "good" against the forces of "evil" and "darkness."

Beck does not use this sort of language metaphorically -- he quite literally believes he is fighting on the side of God against Satan. 

In the months since his trip to the Vatican, Beck has continued to frame the current political debate in our country in biblical, and sometimes apocalyptic, terms.

For example, Beck has:
  • Looked skyward on his TV show and said, "Lord, it's your turn, we've done everything we can" while comparing the current situation in our country to Stephen King's post-apocalyptic novel The Stand. In the same segment, Beck also told people they need to ask for forgiveness, and said that "we're in a dark, dark place" and "dark dudes" are "coming our way." He added, "Now, I'm hoping the guy with horns doesn't actually show up, but he could."
  • Explained that we are fighting "the oldest battle that man has ever fought. It is the battle in the war in heaven. It is the battle that we fought in the Garden of Eden. Choice." Beck also compared Obama and his administration to the snake in the Garden of Eden because he "will make the choices for you."
  • Hosted a panel of pastors and preachers that he billed as "people that need to start standing up." During the show, Beck plugged the "excellent" book by Rev. John Hagee, Can America Survive? 10 Prophetic Signs That We Are the Terminal Generation, which he apparently had just started reading. Hagee's book interprets biblical prophecy to argue that the world is fast approaching Armageddon and the second coming of Jesus Christ. Beck explicitly endorsed Hagee's theory by stating as fact that "a lot of the pieces that have never been here for the prophecy are here now."
  • Repeatedly suggested that progressives and liberals are "enemies of God" and "enemies of Him," and declared that they "don't have [God] on their side."
  • Told his listeners to "make no mistake: You are fighting a power far greater, far greater than any elected official. This has been the works for a very long time." He then warned that the "gates of Hell will open up."
Beck's messianic pretense took the next logical step this week, when he announced a new event . 

The event will be titled "Glenn Beck's Divine Destiny" and will feature "nationally-known figures from all faiths." Beck describes the evening as an "eye-opening" event "that will help heal your soul."

Excerpted and Redacted from MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA AUG 14 2010: