So said Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos (Colombia),
explaining why he had sent a 2001 letter to French Bishop
Pierre Pican of Bayeux-Lisieux. Bishop Pican had just
received a suspended prison sentence for his failure to
report to French authorities the criminal conduct of a priest,
otherwise discovered, who had been tried and condemned
as a pedophile. (The priest, Rene Bissey, was sentenced
to 18 years in jail in 2000 for sexually abusing 11 boys.)
Pierre Pican of Bayeux-Lisieux. Bishop Pican had just
received a suspended prison sentence for his failure to
report to French authorities the criminal conduct of a priest,
otherwise discovered, who had been tried and condemned
as a pedophile. (The priest, Rene Bissey, was sentenced
to 18 years in jail in 2000 for sexually abusing 11 boys.)
In his letter, Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos, then head of the
Vatican office charged with worldwide supervision of priests,
wrote to Bishop Pican, "I congratulate you for not
denouncing a priest to the civil administration." You
have acted well and I am pleased to have a colleague
in the episcopate who, in the eyes of history and of
all other bishops in the world, preferred prison to
denouncing his son and priest."
Vatican office charged with worldwide supervision of priests,
wrote to Bishop Pican, "I congratulate you for not
denouncing a priest to the civil administration." You
have acted well and I am pleased to have a colleague
in the episcopate who, in the eyes of history and of
all other bishops in the world, preferred prison to
denouncing his son and priest."
Now that the Cardinal's letter has received publicity,
the 81 year old prelate has said that the Bishop could
not have reported the priest, as the sexual activity
with young boys had come to light in the Confessional.
But then, why emphasize in a letter publicized by the
Vatican itself on the internet, that the Bishop that
correctly protected, not a penitent in the confessional
but rather "his son and priest."
the 81 year old prelate has said that the Bishop could
not have reported the priest, as the sexual activity
with young boys had come to light in the Confessional.
But then, why emphasize in a letter publicized by the
Vatican itself on the internet, that the Bishop that
correctly protected, not a penitent in the confessional
but rather "his son and priest."
Vatican officialdumb wishes to tell us how to think
but is scandalously unable to think through to a
correct conclusion, how to protect children from
those entrusted with their care, but who are known
by their clerical supervisors to become sexually
aroused by adolescent kids.
but is scandalously unable to think through to a
correct conclusion, how to protect children from
those entrusted with their care, but who are known
by their clerical supervisors to become sexually
aroused by adolescent kids.
(Quotations taken from "Cardinal Justifies Praise
for French Bishop's Silence Over Abuses Priest."
AFP, April 18 2010)
for French Bishop's Silence Over Abuses Priest."
AFP, April 18 2010)
No comments:
Post a Comment